Showing posts with label environmental health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label environmental health. Show all posts

Environmental wellness is always a concern to consider, but this becomes even more vital when you’re pregnant. Not only are you watching out for your own wellbeing; you also have a baby growing inside of you and the outside toxins you’re exposed to could put your baby’s wellness at risk. It’s no secret that prenatal exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) may be harmful to a child’s developing immune system – this has been suggested by plenty of previous research – but few studies have looked into the long-term health outcomes of POP exposure, until now. Findings recently published in Environmental Health Perspectives show that if your baby is exposed to certain POPs while still in the womb, he or she may have an increased risk of developing asthma that persists into young adulthood.


 


Todd Jusko, an environmental epidemiologist at the University of Rochester, who was not involved in the study, comments, ‘The focus in immunotoxicity studies has often been on immunologic intermediates, such as immune cell counts. This study is unique in that it looks at a long-term clinically relevant outcome.’ For the study, Danish researchers evaluated the relationship between asthma and prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), the pesticide hexachlorobenzene (HCB), and dichlorodiphenyl- dichloroethylene (DDE) – which is a daughter compound of the pesticide DDT. Lindsey Konkel, editor for Environmental Health News and The Daily Climate, explains, ‘PCBs, HCB, and DDT have been banned or restricted for many years due to concerns over human health effects, but they persist in the environment and the human body. Although levels of these chemicals have been dropping in the human population, diet—especially seafood consumption—remains an important route of exposure.’


 


Konkel notes, ‘Past studies have reported an association between prenatal exposure to DDE and asthma in children at ages 44 and 7–10. Prenatal HCB exposure has been associated with airway hyper reactivity in rats. Other studies examining prenatal exposure to PCBs and asthma-like symptoms have yielded mixed results; two studies found an association with wheeze in infants and allergic sensitivity in children at age seven while another reported an inverse association with allergic disease.’ However, the authors of the new study argue that previous studies have not followed up with subjects past childhood, and this may be the reason for the divergent findings. According to lead author Susanne Hansen, a doctoral candidate in epidemiology at the Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen, ‘A twenty-year follow-up allows us to distinguish between [true] asthma and asthma-like symptoms, such as wheeze, which may resolve in the first six to seven years of life.’


 


For the study, the researchers examined the blood POP levels of 872 pregnant Danish women. At the age of 20, the children of the mothers who had had the highest blood HCB concentrations during pregnancy were nearly twice as likely to have been prescribed asthma medication as the children of mothers with the lowest concentrations. If the mother had a high level of one particular PCB congener, dioxin-like PCB-118, the child was nearly twice as likely as children of mothers with the lowest levels to have used asthma medications. Michele La Merrill, a developmental toxicologist at the University of California, Davis, asserts, ‘The association between dioxin-like PCB 118 and asthma is an interesting one but not sufficient to suggest a general link between all dioxin-like chemicals and asthma.’ The possibility of such a general link, says Merrill, is ‘a provocative question that would be worth continuing to ask in future studies.’ If you’re pregnant and worried about the long-term effects of POPs, look online or speak to a health professional for ways to reduce your exposure.

There’s nothing more vital to your wellness than the air you breathe, which is why dirty air is such a health concern. Air pollution from motorways, wood smoke and industrial factories can have a major impact on your wellbeing, increasing your risks of heart attacks and strokes, and even causing behavioural problems in your kids if you were highly exposed to pollution during pregnancy. More often than not, you only have one solution to counteract the severe damage that particulate matter does to your heart and brain; move away. However, as this is not always the most practical option, scientists have come up with a new way to fight the damage caused by dirty air; omega-3 fish oil.


 


According to a new study, published in Environmental Health Perspectives, taking fish oil supplements for as little as four weeks can reduce the impact of air pollution on your heart health. For the study, researchers from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Institute for Environmental Health Scientists gave 29 healthy middle-aged adults either omega-3 fish oil supplements or olive oil supplements. After the four-week study period, the study participants were exposed to air pollution levels similar to those in an urban environment. The scientists did this by putting the test subjects in enclosed chambers for two hours, and tested their blood levels before and after the exposure in order to note any changes.


 


The results of the study revealed that those who took fish oil supplements had a far lower variability of heart rate, which is a marker for cardiovascular damage, than those taking the olive oil placebo. The fish oil supplement group also had lower levels of other markers of cardiac distress, and their levels of LDL (bad) cholesterol and lipid (blood fat) levels remained steady after exposure, the olive oil group demonstrated spikes. This shows that adding fish oil supplements to your regular programme of healthy eating, exercising (for weight loss and stress relief) and not smoking can help keep you from succumbing to air-pollution-induced heart problems.


 


However, before you rush out to stock up on supplements, it’s important to bear in mind the type of supplements used in this study. The participants were taking three grams of fish oil every day for four weeks, which is the average dose you would expect from most over-the-counter supplements. Still, that is not to say that all supplements are the same; you have to be particularly careful when it comes to fish oil. This is because low-quality products could increase your exposure to contaminants such as mercury and PCBs, which surely defeats the point of taking them! So, when choosing your fish oil supplements, remember the following three steps:


 


1. Consult independent tests: The Environmental Defence Fund has surveyed 75 fish oil manufacturers to see if they purify their fish oils to remove PCBs and mercury, and published a list of the healthier supplements. Or you could look on ConsumerLab.com, which conducts tests on fish oils every year to identify health-undermining contaminants in your fish oil supplements.


 


2. Read the label carefully: Tests from ConsumerLab.com show that the concentration of the different omega-3s in the fish oil can vary, but what you’re looking for are the most beneficial fatty acids; EPA and DHA. The study’s most effective dosage comprised of 410 milligrams of EPA and 274 milligrams of DHA.


 


3. Don’t mistake a high price for quality: ConsumerLab.com tests show that some of the best-quality supplements don’t cost an arm and a leg; just because a brand costs more doesn’t mean you’re getting a better-quality product.