Showing posts with label water nbsp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label water nbsp. Show all posts

 


Written by Jenny Catton


 


When it comes to saving water around the home, most of us are familiar with the usual advice – choose showers rather than baths, don’t leave taps running and fix any drips. And whilst it’s true that these simple steps can make a big difference; modern technology and clever gadgets now offer a whole host of new ways to save even more water.


 


In the bathroom


Try eco-shower heads to reduce the amount of water used when you take a shower. These devices cause water droplets to be filled with air – giving you a refreshing shower but using less water.


 


In the loo


It’s estimated that 30% of household water usage comes from flushing the loo. Invest in a water-saving device for your cistern and you could save over a litre of water every time you flush.


 


In the garden


Swap your traditional hosepipe for a spray gun. Because the spray gun is operated with a trigger, you only direct the water exactly where you need it, meaning you use less.


 


In the kitchen


If you find you regularly boil more water than you need, you may want to invest in an eco-kettle. These let you fill the kettle but then you dictate how much you want to boil and use at a time. The rest of the water then remains un-boiled in the kettle for use later. This not only saves water as you’re not throwing away the extra water you’ve boiled but also saves energy as you’re only heating the water you need.


 


For more ways to save water around the home, visit: www.futurefriendly.co.uk

 


 


Fluoride is a mineral that occurs naturally in drinking water but in some areas where natural levels are low, the mineral is added in a process known as fluoridation. However, experts struggle to agree whether fluoridation is a positive practice. So should fluoride be added to our drinking water?


 


Yes – Michael

Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral – it’s not an artificial ingredient or a dangerous chemical so I don’t think there is any problem adding it to the water supply. We know that fluoride is crucial for good dental health as it strengthens tooth enamel and protects against tooth decay. By adding it to drinking water we are helping people avoid uncomfortable and costly dental treatment. We also need to remember that tooth decay has been linked to more serious problems such as heart disease so it’s important to do all we can to prevent these issues.


I know some people worry that fluoridation might have unwanted side effects but the process has been studied and reviewed many times and experts have shown that it is completely safe. And the benefits are clear to see – I’ve seen studies showing that children who live in areas where fluoridation occurs have almost 60 percent less tooth decay than children living in non-fluoridated areas. We have to trust that the Government has our best interests at heart and wouldn’t add something to our drinking supply that could be dangerous.


It’s also important to remember that fluoride is only added to water in areas where its natural levels are low. By adding it we are just bringing those areas up to the same levels as the rest of the country. Fluoridation has been well researched and is good for our health so I don’t think there’s anything to worry about.


 


 


No – Annabel

There are a number of problems with adding fluoride to drinking water. Perhaps the most important is that it takes away our freedom of choice. I don’t think anyone – whether it’s the Government, or health practitioners, has the right to dictate what supplements I should be taking. If we allow fluoride to be added to water now, then who knows what else might be added in a few years time just because experts think it’s good for us.


I also don’t believe adequate research has been conducted into fluoridation. I’ve heard that excess fluoride can lead to all sorts of health problems from causing arthritic symptoms to lowering the IQ. And ironically, too much fluoride can actually cause dental problems as there is a condition called fluorosis which occurs when children’s teeth are exposed to too much fluoride.


Dosage is also a big concern as there’s no way of controlling how much fluoride each individual receives as we all drink different amounts of water. In addition, some people are more sensitive to fluoride than others so would be advised to avoid high amounts – but what choice do they have if it is added to our drinking water? Surely if we have a problem with dental decay it would be better to educate people about good dental hygiene so that they can take control of their own health, rather than taking away people’s choices.


 

Experts have sounded the alarm over Japan’s environmental wellbeing this week, as the country is storing 200,000 tonnes of radioactive water in makeshift tanks that are vulnerable to leaks. This is according to the operator of Japan’s tsunami-hit nuclear power plant, who said that there’s no reliable way to check on the tanks or anywhere to transfer the water.


 


The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was inspected last week, with Japan’s nuclear watchdog members looking into the contaminated water tanks. This is the latest in a long list of environmental wellness concerns, following multiple recent accidents, leaks and breakdowns. These problems show just how vulnerable the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant site is, even though it has been more than two years since the powerful earthquake and tsunami set off meltdowns at three reactors.


 


Two weeks ago, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe promised that his government would take a more active role in the site’s cleanup, and so this new announcement has raised questions about how seriously he has taken that pledge. The government is still pushing to restart the country’s nuclear power programme, and the Prime Minister headed out to the Middle East on Saturday to promote Japanese exports to the region, including nuclear technology.


 


However, opposition lawmakers have demanded that Mr. Abe stay home and declare a state of emergency. At an anti-nuclear rally outside Mr. Abe’s office in Tokyo, Yoshiko Kira of the opposition Japan Communist Party, which made significant gains in parliamentary elections last month, commented, ‘The nuclear crisis is real and ongoing, yet the government continues to look the other way. The government should declare a state of emergency right now, and intervene to stop the outflow of contaminated water.’


 


How the crisis at the Fukushima plant will affect Mr. Abe’s extensive popularity remains to be seen, but what is clear is that the plant’s operator, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco), may not be able to handle the increasingly problems at the plant. At the sprawling complex, Tepco has built almost 1,000 tanks in order to store as many as 335,000 tons of contaminated water. This water is the result of the coolant that the plant pumps into the reactors to keep the cores from overheating, as well as the groundwater that they pour into their breached basements at a rate of 400 tonnes a day.


 


Tepco has admitted that one tank has sprung a huge leak this week, which could spell disaster if the other tanks follow suit. The 36-foot-tall cylindrical tanks were constructed as a temporary repository for the growing amount of radiated water at the complex, but Tepco announced that the builders had used vulnerable rubber sealing and the tanks’ ability to withstand radiation was not tested. Noriyuki Imaizumi, the acting general manager of Tepco’s nuclear power division, stated that the leaked water can be carried to the sea by a nearby drain, and high radiation readings suggest that this has already occurred.


 


According to the Nuclear Regulation Authority, which the Japanese government has ordered to more actively advise and monitor Tepco’s activities at the plant, the company needs to transfer the water into more durable vessels. However, an authority commissioner, Toyoshi Fuketa, said that after seeing the plant on Friday, the possibility of doing this quickly is ‘unrealistic.’ Tepco acknowledged that the water beneath the reactors is extremely contaminated. If it gets into the ocean, it will exceed even the disaster’s earliest leaks. Michio Aoyama, a senior scientist in the Oceanography and Geochemistry Research Department at the government-affiliated Meteorological Research Institute, admitted, ‘That prospect scares me. It’s the ultimate, worst-case scenario.’